An interesting phenomenon of the 1970s was the byproduct of the Cold War between
the United States and the Soviet Union, the culture war. We sent them rock and
roll groups and Hollywood films. They sent us the Kirov Ballet and the Moscow
Art Theater. Culture in the United States exists on many levels. Except for
middle class adventurers who will seek the new, the experimental, the classics,
wealth dominates all arenas, save theater. Opera, ballet, classical music, are
funded by government and private donors. They are invariably not-fot-profit
endeavors, whose mission is to provide the highest quality of performance
achievable.
The peculiar nature of fine art
is so removed from performance requirements that it exists in its own unique
plane. Only the rich can afford to buy masterworks, though the public can visit
well stocked art museums and see fine art. The problem is that most of the
public have no idea what they’re looking at, evinced by their rapid transit
through display galleries. The public is invariably too intimidated to go into
commercial art galleries, a condition encouraged by pretentious art gallery
personnel, who assume the public are not customers, ergo of no interest. It’s
even more difficult for the artists. Once it took a long time to become an old
master. Warhol, Lichtenstein and a few others did it in record time, their
paintings commanding multi-millions, pressuring art students, who may not be
taught that there is room at the top for only a fortunate
few.
Theater is by
far the strangest artistic endeavor. Broadway productions are a financial
venture that are only incidentally exercises in art. The cost of a Broadway
production is so high that the goal is to produce a hit that will run a long
time, repay the investors, then make a profit. Obviously this is not an arena
for experimentation. Production values are generally high, but content, designed
to reach mass audiences, tends to become safer and safer, the more production
costs soar. The bread, butter and entrées of Broadway are musical theater.
The most successful productions are revivals and formula
stories.
Off-Broadway production costs are becoming increasingly expensive, so a
capital investment is required to present a play that must earn money, or suffer
a financial loss that ends the show. Regional theater must cater to its
subscription audience, a graying group, not readily replaceable, less and less
susceptible to challenging drama.. Off-Off Broadway is usually a yell-in, or so
sloppy that only Mommas love their actor sons and daughters. There are a few
good small theaters that try their best to produce entertaining work, but their
audience is also aging rapidly. At a recent Saturday night performance of a
classic, at a respectable small theater, the house was only ¾s full and the
average age was 65. American theater suborned by middle of the road university
theater department mentalities, correlated by the deleterious products of the
superficial showcase system, has further fallen victim to increasingly visual
innovation in tvs, nourished by cable and the internet, all these formats
combining to obsolete theater.
Gary Beck
No comments:
Post a Comment